Times Square Promenade Liberated

After 14 years of operation, it has recently been revealed that the promenade outside Times Square (in Hong Kong) is actually public land. Since the promenade first opened in 1994, citizens have been prevented from sitting, squating, eating, drinking, or even loitering in this space, which is evidently the equivalent of a public park. Times Square may not have publicly claimed this land as theirs, but their actions have certainly reflected otherwise.

In the past, this space has been used by private companies as venues for product placement, shows, a cafe, as well as other commercial ventures. It is still a mystery as to how much money changed hands between private companies for the use of this public land. Times Square security guards have also made a special effort to stop people from doing things management considered "unsightly". Sometimes this included simply standing around. (Curiously, no security guard ever stopped people from smoking in this area.)

The good news is that this incident has triggered an investigation by the press, to find and liberate all the "private" spaces that actually belong to the public. The people will finally regain their right to enjoy these gardens, parks, and rest areas. No longer will they be charged for useage, or barred from entering.

I guess in the end we have Times Square management to thank. If they didn't push their security guards to kick people out, there would be little to know uproar, and the land discovery would be a small page 5 headline. What touched me about the result was a caller on a radio show, happily proclaiming that she could finally sit in the promenade and eat lunch in peace.

A Hero Steps Down

Hero of Democracy and one of China's worst enemies, Martin Lee (李柱銘), ends his political career after 23 long years. Lee has been, and is still the face of democracy in Hong Kong.

Thank you, Martin.

Stink Eye of the Tiger

Tiger Woods curses out photographers and threatens to break some ****ing necks. Media frenzy ensues.

The coolest thing about this whole thing is that Tiger did not apologize. What's cool about Tiger is that he takes a stand, and sticks to his guns. Anyone who criticizes Tiger just hasn't been in his shoes. I'm not just talking about tournament play. All the pros play under tournament conditions with their paychecks on the line and where every shot counts.

Tiger plays under those conditions with the addition of literally the entire golf world watching, hundreds of fans and press in tow. The incident took place during perhaps the most tense of conditions in a regular, non-major event: the final day, with Tiger not in the lead. Ninety-nine percent of people would've cracked in that situation.

Furthermore, if you think cursing in public is an anomaly in pro golf, then perhaps you need to watch more pro golf (live of course).

A Case of 排華

What happened in Lhasa? The reason for violence, you ask? We've seen this all before in the Philippines and in Indonesia. "Overseas Chinese" becoming the targets of violence, with the perpetrators being the locals, or natives.

What people often forget, is that Tibet really isn't China. China wants everyone to think Tibet is part of China, when it's actually not. The easiest way to find out is to ask a native Tibetan (no, not a Chinese person living in Tibet) what he/she thinks Tibet is part of. It would be the equivalent of saying Hong Kong was part of Britain from the 1897 to 1997. Hong Kong was under British rule, but it was never ever not part of China.

In the end, what matters most is the perception fo the people. A good many Hong Kongers are pretty attached to Britain. Okay, maybe rooting for the national football team doesn't really count, but I digress. Tibetans do not consider themselves to be Chinese no matter how hard you try to spin it. The matter worsens when people from the Mainland (漢人) come to Tibet, take up land, open up businesses, make a ton of money, and slowly but surely replace the Tibetan culture with that of their own.

A people can only lie down for so long. I don't support violence of any kind, but what did people expect.

HSBC: The Wealthy Man's Bank

Is the zero percent savings interest rate a shock? Not really. However, from a lowly HSBC customer's perspective, the HKD5000 minimum deposit requirement most certainly raises eyebrows. Not only is HSBC giving the lowest of low interest for deposits (0.01%), they're also charging customers HKD50 for having less than HKD5000 in their savings accounts.

There are plenty of people living and working in Hong Kong who don't have $5000 to their name. Is HSBC out of touch, or simply trying to filter out the poor? After the ATM Charge Incident, and the bank's silly marketing campaigns, I just might leave them in the dust pretty soon.

Instead of helping me save money, HSBC spends money on stupid ads like this: